Have written before that the divisional Mountie HQ did a certain deed against me at the beginning of my criminal matters. They did it for a mistaken reason--because they'd been misled about the false, gay story.... As far as the public goes, I think we could loosely refer to this as a "misunderstanding...?" We don't need to lie if someone wants the details but we don't have to broadcast everything, in my opinion.
There was something the firefighters and their helper did at the beginning of the criminal matters also, and I think that could be called a misunderstanding, as well? I don't want to spell out all the details in this public blog...and they've been discussed elsewhere earlier.
The point I'm trying to make is that the divisional Mounties weren't the only ones who were mistaken.... So, if we just generally state--as far as needs to be stated--that there were misunderstandings, I think that would cover it?
As far as I can see, the specific, divisional Mounties need to understand all the facts and angles of the police project; and then they can decide if they want to go forward, or not?
No comments:
Post a Comment