If some parties were honestly concerned about the interests of the "Irish boy," they maybe had some reason to be!? There was a particular movie from the early 1970s, which I wrote about in the original blog. Then there was another movie in the late 1970s. And the first
Children of the Corn film came out in 1984. Did someone just decide to wonder about the Irish boy's interests, at some point? It's true that he and his associates had been sent down a certain path--not a very nice one. But at this time, it's not productive for anyone to fight for the Irish boy's rights at the expense of mine--if I have to say so! [I'm willing to cooperate with them; and to help them, as far as possible. It doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to turn all the business matters over to him, however. And some people have been very nervous of any possible contacts I might have with him. (Am not referring to he, himself.)]
As for my uncle's support of the gay rights project, it's possible he was supporting the "Irish boy" without realizing what the main strategy of the parties was!? Will have to try to send some hints in my uncle's direction.... [The other parties still have to behave responsibly, also! Myself, am not 100% sure how things should work out--exactly. I have an idea. And I'm not completely sure who is behind which type of story!?]
If any individual has been involved in public love stories that were told--whether it was the person's wish or not--they may not be a good candidate to speak publicly about the gay rights project!? The bottom line is, it's not meant to be a dating game for anybody--and we don't want it to appear that way [right?]! It makes sense that if a certain project or concern was promoted, they wouldn't want to get side-tracked from it! [Even though film people and others are free to tell whatever other romantic stories they wish to! (Assuming they're not about real-life people without their consent.)]
From my view, it doesn't so much matter which man I was supposed to work with--if a "Senator Smith" [from
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, 1939] situation was coming up [in public]. Have said I'm trying to be cooperative and agreeable. But even if the "Irish boy" wanted to speak publicly, it wouldn't be easy for film people and some of the public to take him seriously! [Previous films/TV are still on record, too.] It might even be impossible!?
As far as good efforts go, it says in the Bible that one person sows, another reaps, and it's God who gives the increase!--Did I quote it correctly? Nobody can do everything! They have to share the work--and the glory! [Have said that I'm interested in seeing the parties compensated fairly--will do what I can, if and when I have a chance.]
Some parties also don't have to assume what my role will be in this matter--when it goes public. [It's just a matter of time--short or very short--before it will, I believe.] There have been many parties involved; and not all of them were generally known. [I've been answering to "Mr. Spud," for all intents and purposes! (Some humour--but not completely.)] And that's where the battle may continue; but I'll do what I can! [I can't control others but I can do the best I can.]