Have been dealing with both the "black" side and the "white" side; and it seems people sometimes get nervous about it? They're afraid I'm consorting with the enemy!? But part of the idea has been to bring the two sides together, rather than having a wide gap in between. We want to accomplish something worthwhile in the end. People really don't need to worry, in my opinion. [Maybe I need to worry for my own sake--wondering how long it will take to sort things out!? But we'll get there, sooner or later....]
Haven't been able to post any new photos for a while. Sorry, I haven't had my supplies available.
This is the second part of my original Waterlily Story blog. Would like to tell more about myself and add some pictures. [For background information, please go to the first blog. People should also look through the list of Labels if they have concerns about a particular area. They can click on each subject separately, as they wish.] Thanks for visiting!
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Negotiating
As I've written in the original blog before, Internet notes state that the work of secret police may be partly open and partly hidden. Hasn't it been that way in my case? And we're negotiating to come to a conclusion.
Friday, November 5, 2010
New Links
Have added a Link in the sidebar to the location which I felt was similar to scenery in the "Lost Stallions" movie [mentioned below]. The scenes aren't exactly the same [not quite] but the type of rock and the trees seem to be similar. Also, have added a Link to a popular landmark in NW Ontario--the "Sleeping Giant Mountain!"
In the middle 1970s, I worked in Thunder Bay with friends for a short time during the summer. It was a nice visit, at the time. Later, I moved there to live for a while during the late 1990s.
In the middle 1970s, I worked in Thunder Bay with friends for a short time during the summer. It was a nice visit, at the time. Later, I moved there to live for a while during the late 1990s.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Hyphenated Names
The significance of the "Do-Right" character is partly that hyphenated names have represented gay marriage issues in film, in the past [maybe still?]. And some parties were honestly trying to "do right," even though there have been all kinds of antics, whatever! [Note: "Do-Right" is from a movie, "Dudley Do-Right"--see Link in sidebar for "Mountie/Horse Film."]
Competing Stories!?
Have written in the first blog about the "Queen Lady." I first met her in the late spring or early summer of 1978. Then I met my husband-to-be around the end of the summer in 1978. So, these two "storylines"--whether completely revealed in public or not--ran almost parallel to each other! As I've stated before, the "Irish boy" had been led to believe I was gay--and some people probably wanted to keep him away from me. But there were people who knew differently. Have also written that my husband-to-be and I had problems to deal with--but sexual orientation concerns weren't among them! Anyway, I think Hollywood writers can always tell realistic-sounding stories about whatever they wish to. But it seems some parties had more connections than even I've been aware of!?
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Lost, or Not?
Wanted to clarify some points which I wrote about yesterday. I said there had been a lot of "gay hype" in a NW Ontario city where I moved to earlier; and it seemed some chiefs of police approved of that kind of thing!? They wanted to support gay issues--somewhat!? On the other hand, there was a suggestion that one "Chief" thought the parties around him needed to shape up!--They needed help!
So, was it gays and gay-supporters who needed help!? If so, what kind of help!? [Did they need the Chief's help--according to his own personal standards---or those of judgmental Christians around him???]
If some people really want to help gays and gay issues, are they willing to take the matter seriously? Are they willing to go beyond the "hype" and some superficial indulgence???
In the blog writing I've been doing, in this blog and the original one, I've already acknowledged gay issues. It's not that I'm ignoring them. [And I've written about them in an official report.] And the parties associated with me still haven't been willing to acknowledge much of anything! What are they waiting for, I wonder? I've provided the best answers I've been able to find--and they're not just my own ideas. And I won't be having much more to say.--I don't intend to follow some frivolous "hype."
[The Ontario parties have wanted to follow Ontario views, for the most part. They haven't been willing to look much past their own borders, so far. But a few parties may be working behind the scenes--somewhere.--I believe so.]
Is it possible some police parties are still trying to block or cover up the gay rights project completely? [Some may have wanted to cover it because they thought it would never be accepted and exposed appropriately!?] And the others are in a frivolous place? There have been parties from western Canada, and from elsewhere, who have already acknowledged that there was something sensible happening, I believe? [They were waiting for the local people to get things together?] But it doesn't help for anyone to have a shallow view with weak efforts! We need to think sensibly and seriously, and to do what really works.
Maybe the "Lost Stallions" movie shows the two extremes of thinking--the hype, and the judgmental attitudes!?
So, was it gays and gay-supporters who needed help!? If so, what kind of help!? [Did they need the Chief's help--according to his own personal standards---or those of judgmental Christians around him???]
If some people really want to help gays and gay issues, are they willing to take the matter seriously? Are they willing to go beyond the "hype" and some superficial indulgence???
In the blog writing I've been doing, in this blog and the original one, I've already acknowledged gay issues. It's not that I'm ignoring them. [And I've written about them in an official report.] And the parties associated with me still haven't been willing to acknowledge much of anything! What are they waiting for, I wonder? I've provided the best answers I've been able to find--and they're not just my own ideas. And I won't be having much more to say.--I don't intend to follow some frivolous "hype."
[The Ontario parties have wanted to follow Ontario views, for the most part. They haven't been willing to look much past their own borders, so far. But a few parties may be working behind the scenes--somewhere.--I believe so.]
Is it possible some police parties are still trying to block or cover up the gay rights project completely? [Some may have wanted to cover it because they thought it would never be accepted and exposed appropriately!?] And the others are in a frivolous place? There have been parties from western Canada, and from elsewhere, who have already acknowledged that there was something sensible happening, I believe? [They were waiting for the local people to get things together?] But it doesn't help for anyone to have a shallow view with weak efforts! We need to think sensibly and seriously, and to do what really works.
Maybe the "Lost Stallions" movie shows the two extremes of thinking--the hype, and the judgmental attitudes!?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)